I believe that the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world.
I believe all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of kinship, love and tolerance.
I don't believe in distinction of any kind, such as
- race, colour, ethnicity, nationality
- sex, gender identity
- sexual orientation
- language, culture
- religion, spirituality
- political opinion
- any opinion
- origin (social, national or any other kind)
- age
- weight, size
- looks, beauty or lack of it
- disability or illness, visible or invisible, of mind or body
- property, wealth
- birth
- other status or identity

Monday, December 7, 2020

Junior is Triggered, part XII

 "Well, here, right now, at long last, I would like to put all those rumors to rest. I will not be seeking political office. In fact, I won’t be continuing in politics at all. I have my sights on something much bigger.

Effective immediately, I am going to concentrate all my efforts on becoming the greatest, most powerful player in the nine-to-twelve-year-old division of my local girls’ softball league."

Well... don't set your hopes high, those 9-12 years old girls are dangerous. Maybe try something a little bit less... "challenging"? Like preverbal toddlers? Then you wouldn't be interrupted by mean people saying hurtful things.  

Besides, considering that you have been concentrating all your efforts on this for over a year now, it looks like you won't make it. Like your dad, someone should have told him not to run for second term. I suppose you are going to blame Covid. 

On serious note, a whole chapter on transpeople! I never knew they were THAT scary!

It is pitiful, junior.
What have transpeople ever done to you for you to hate them? They don't have anything to do with Democrats, they don't have anything to do with you, they aren't threatening anything or anyone, they are a totally harmless minority and so small a minority at that... they aren't even accepted by some GLBTQA+ people! And as if the world wasn't full of derogatory mockery and misinformation about transpeople.
It's like shooting fish in a barrel!
Seriously, had you been Teddy Roosevelt, and they had brought you the tied up bear cub, you would have shut it, and then bragged about it.

This is low even for you.

 

Trump Really, Really, Really Does Not Like Trans People

"It is no longer anyone’s business what sex you were assigned at birth"

It has never been anyone's business what sex you were assigned at birth. Why would it be? Why are you so interested about what's between the legs of people?

"If I wake up one day feeling like a thirteen-year-old girl named Susan (which would come as a pretty big surprise to my girlfriend, Kimberly), then you are required—by law in some countries—to call me that."


I don't think it would come as such a big surprise to her.
But, firstly, there's quite a lot more to being transgendered than "today I want to be a girl!". Secondly, if you want to be a 13yo girl named Susan, be it. Doesn't bother me.

Then, if you want to play in Little League - probably because that's the only place where you could win... though I doubt even that - it's up to the Little League if they accept you. You could always try to sue them for not letting your inner 13yo girl play, but even if you won, I would say the other parents would run you out of the city.
It didn't go so well for Danny Almonte. And no Democrats were screaming "let the poor boy play!"

Now, the issue of transpeople has nothing to do with adult people being so tired of losing they start cheating. It would be nice if you actually met and discussed the issues with actual transgendered people, the same way you talked things with your bluecollars, but I don't think you would. Discussing with people "like that" probably damages your fragile masculinity, and the relations with Trump voter base. You can't have that, now. Besides, the transpeople are such a minority no-one cares. And your audience loves it when you mock minorities, especially those they feel are threatening them.

It never cease to amaze me how fragile the macho masculinity is. A man wears a ballgown. Your masculinity is fractured. A man kisses another man. Another crack. Gillette has an ad telling guys they don't need to bully, fight, and treat women like trash to be men, and you lose your mind. 

"Just ask Kate Scottow, a woman who lives in Hertfordshire, England. In February 2019, she was arrested by local police for “harassing” a transgender woman (which means a man who identifies as a woman). You see, she referred to her as a “he” on Twitter. (I know, I know. This can get confusing.) Police showed up at Scottow’s apartment and arrested her in front of her autistic ten-year-old daughter and her twenty-month-old infant son. In court, the prosecutor accused Scottow of engaging in a “campaign of targeted harassment” against the transgender activist, all because she refused to call the activist by her preferred pronoun."

Oh, poor Kate Scottow.
Again, had she just done that, nothing would have happened. No-one can force anyone to use correct pronouns of them, and it's not illegal. But there were no quotation marks around the harassment in this case. It was a campaign of targeted harassment. This woman created several twitter accounts just to harass transgendered people, not just Stephanie. She didn't only post comments on Stephanie's Twitter, she spoke crap about her elsewhere, too, accusing her of racism (never any evidence or reference to what she was talking about) and said things like: 'He is a very, very sick individual. I have evidence of that.' (The kind of "evidence" Trump has on election fraud 2020. No-one ever sees it because it doesn't exist.)
There were TWO court orders telling her to stop the harassment, but she continued. Just created another Twitter account, as if that made it OK.
It's not a question of freedom of speech. Freedom of speech is when J.K.Rowling goes out saying things on her own twitter account, or when Harry Miller talks crap on his. Kate Scottow went out of her way to actually harass a person, against a court order.
Had she not committed a crime, she would not have been arrested in front of her children. Now she threw away a whole career she had been investing a lot of work, time and money on.
You call it "left's nonsense", I call it "TERF idiocy". I don't think disagreeing with on how other people identify themselves is worth getting arrested in front of my children and throwing away a promising career, but she obviously thought it was.
And now you are blaming her victims for her reaping the just and fair harvest of what she chose to sow - of her own will, well knowing the situation.

It's like all these people whining about social media "silencing them" - when we joined the site (private owned, how ever big they are - which means that they have all the rights to set which ever rules they want to), we all signed an agreement where we said that we would follow the rules, among other things to be civil and not harass other users, not engage in criminal activities (like defamation), and not to post deliberate falsehoods as truth. And when these people do (like Milo whatthefuckhisnameis), and get kicked out for breaching the agreement, they start whining.
Pitiful.
And the fact that most people haven't read the agreement, where the site very clearly explains all the rules you agree to follow, is no excuse. You signed the agreement.
(Crossing that "I have read the code of conduct and I agree" box counts as legal signature.)

"Now, for those of you who haven’t heard about all this transgender news, let me see if I can catch you up."

Oh, please don't. I'm 100% certain of that you can't.

"According to liberals today, many of whom reside in their mom’s basements or their university dorm rooms"

says a middle-aged man who lives in his daddy's attic. (But it's OK, daddy furnished it very nicely.)

How old were you when you decided to be a boy? How did you know you were a boy?
How old were you when you decided other children's gender mattered? How did it matter? Boys played with G.I.Joes and girls with G.I.Janes?

I knew already when I was five that I was a girl, and I learned that it mattered so that all the fun and interesting toys were meant for other kids, I wasn't allowed to play with them, because I was "a girl". Other than that - nah. Nothing important. "Plumbing" looked a bit different, most kids were dressed a little differently according to if they were "girls" or "boys". There was no physiological imperative for this, it was just the way it had always been done. Then came the puberty and the physical differences grew, and people kept telling me I wasn't "allowed" to do this or that, because it was meant for boys and I was not a boy. No rational reasoning for that either. Just the way it had always been done. That is about the stupidest reason to do things.

"you have to refer to that person with whatever names and pronouns they ask you to"

Isn't that just common manners? I call you Susan or Donald or what ever you want, because it's none of my business what name you wish to use of yourself. No skin off my nose.

"Also, you don’t need to undergo any sort of gender reassignment surgery or hormone therapy to change your gender anymore. All you have to do is declare that you are another gender, and people have to accept it."

How is this a problem?

"So if you call a person Betty when s/he is feeling like Billy, what happens?"

Depends on how close friends you are. If they are your colleague, probably nothing. If you are a friend, he'll probably tells you you used the wrong name. It's usually rather clear to see who they are. Betty behaves differently from Billy, and often dresses differently as well. If you aren't their friend or colleague, I don't see why you would be calling them anything.

"Do you get charged with a hate crime?"

No.

"What if that person feels as though you committed a hate crime?"

They'll think you are an asshole, and react accordingly. If you care, you'll apologize. If you don't, you won't.
It's not complicated.

"Because remember: These days, all that really matters is feelings. Facts, evidence, and logic have gone out the window. Once you accept the fact that feelings matter more than facts, it doesn’t matter whether you’re dealing with religion, race, or kids’ basketball games. You’re in trouble."

President Trump lost the election 2020. A month later, his supporters, still refusing to accept the defeat - mostly because president Trump is refusing to accept the defeat, because it doesn't feel good, and fact, evidence and logic doesn't matter - are sending death threats to the election workers and state officials of the biggest states where Joe Biden won, trying to force them to give the victory to Trump. It has gone so far that Trump called his old friend and supporter "enemy of the people".

Deplorable, indeed. Sore loser.

"For example, take CeCe Telfer"

Let's take Cecé Telfer. Thank you for using the correct pronoun.

What you need to understand about the testosterone suppression therapy is that it cuts off the testosterone that the muscles need to be "nearly twice as durable and powerful as those of the average female". She lost quite a lot of her muscle mass because of the hormone therapy. On top of that, every ciswoman has now more testosterone than she does. On top of that, she has been used to use a body with stronger muscles, and has been forced to learn to use a body that isn't as effective. Something all the ciswomen have been using their whole life. Sure, she's very tall, but that's not always a bonus. She also learned to run on men's track, which is different from women's track. So, no, I don't see her having an advantage.
And, in fact, Cecé did not "smoke the competition". She didn't win everything she participated in, which means that there were several cisgirls who were better than Cecé, and there probably are some girls who think that's so unfair as well. Do you remember Tara Lipinski and Michelle Kwan?

I'm a cis female, I was running when I was young, and I don't mind. I believe in science, and when they show me how much the performance goes down on testosterone suppressants, I'm fine with this. 

Now... why do you mind?

"If I’ve learned one thing about children—and human beings in general—it’s that they can thrive only when they’re challenged. Just as your muscles won’t grow if you don’t put them under the stress of weight lifting and your mind won’t expand if you don’t fill it with difficult thoughts, books, and arguments, people can’t grow if they’re not made uncomfortable, or at least challenged, sometimes."

In my mind shielding young people from racism, intolerance, and bullying is more important than shielding young people from competing and not winning. The kids who lie on 20th place have worked equally hard as the kids who are on 1-5, but no-one cares one bit about them. In my mind complaining about transgirls having unfair advantage of the male physique, is finding excuses because one doesn't want to accept the fact that one lost. I don't think any one of these girls will participate in Olympics.
Cecé won't. She wants to become a nurse. 

Also, "pretending to be a girl" just to be able to win in high school and college competitions? There's more to life than running. Do you think the transhate is so dismissable people would risk it just to win some races? And what about dating and social life? "Pretending to be a girl" has an impact on EVERY ASPECT of your life. It's not worth it.

"Even Martina Navratilova, the legendary tennis player who grew up not too far from my grandparents’ village in Czechoslovakia, weighed in. Here’s a woman who had worked her entire life to become one of the greatest of all time. To her, the idea that we were going to allow men who couldn’t hack it in their own division to start competing against women was “cheating.”"

But as an intelligent woman, she took a closer look at the issue, and changed her mind. How about that...

If Martina Navratilova's thinking on trans athletes can evolve, so can sport

"From track and field to volleyball to weight lifting, trans athletes are smashing women’s hard-earned records."

Ah, I see...

"Democratic Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar called for an investigation into USA Powerlifting in January after the athletic association announced that male lifters who identify as transgender women aren’t allowed to compete as women.

Omar called it a “myth” that men who identify as transgender women have a “direct competitive advantage” in a Jan. 31 letter she sent to USA Powerlifting on behalf of Jaycee Cooper, a male powerlifter in Omar’s district who identifies as a transgender woman."

Ilhan Omar Urges Keith Ellison To Investigate USA Powerlifting For Barring Biological Males From Women’s Events


"It’s funny, you never hear about trans men (women) dominating men’s divisions. I’ll wait for that to happen before I start rooting for trans women (men) who compete in the women’s divisions."

ZHANG Shan: The only female shooter to win gold in a mixed competition

10 transgender athletes explain why it’s fair to compete

"But when it comes to contact sports, there’s more than just our sense of fairness and lost scholarships on the line. This is where it becomes a safety issue. I don’t think anyone was totally comfortable, for instance, when a mediocre mixed martial arts fighter named Fallon Fox decided he was going to transition to a woman. This wasn’t just a man who wanted to run races in lanes next to women. This was a man who was losing bouts to other men, so he decided he wanted to beat up women instead. In one of his last fights, against a woman named Tamikka Brents—who held on for a very long time, considering the circumstances—Fox used his big hands to beat Brents into an early technical knockout. Hours after the match, doctors discovered that Brents’s skull had been fractured. There is no universe in which that should be acceptable, nor is there anyone who can argue that it was a fair fight!"

So... Tamikka Brents lost, and somehow Fallon Fox is a crook? It's MMA for crying out loud. People suffer from fractured bones, skulls and eye sockets included, concussions, you name it. It is totally acceptable in this universe, and both fighters were in it of their free will, and there were judges, so looks totally fair fight to me. It's not the size of the hands, it's how you use them...

People who had also "shattered eye socket":

Jack Hermansson “
Broken toe and broken eye socket but not a broken spirit. The goal remains the same! Thank you for your support.”
 

Karolina Kowalkiewicz “
After the fight, I spent all day in the hospital. S*** happens. I still love this sport and UFC. Don’t worry I’ll be OK.”
 

Miesha Tate.

Lucia Rijker has fought guys, and held hers. 

Theybies? Sounds like a great idea. Because people treat "boys" and "girls" differently.

"I'm shocked, SHOCKED, that the gender-neutral craze caught on in Hollywood".

Aren't you easily shocked.

Genderbread person? Yep, that's how it works. Maybe you need to work with it a bit. 

"When it starts to get harmful, in my opinion, is right around the time some of the crazy parents begin going to “gender specialists,” who wear white coats and stethoscopes, to discuss whether or not their little theybies should begin the process of transitioning genders in a medical way. In some cases, parents whose children express tendencies of genders other than their own—boys who like to play with dolls, for example, or girls who like little toy army men—are told by these specialists that hormone therapy to suppress puberty, and/or a full-on surgical transition, might be the only way forward."

Yeah... isn't it great that that doesn't happen.
Boys who like to play with dolls are still boys. Girls who like little toy army men are still girls. The idea of that tomboys are being brainwashed into believing they are really boys is a TERF fantasy, and based on the fact that they don't have the slightest idea of what transgenderism is. 

The hormone therapy to suppress puberty just delays the puberty, it has been done for 40 years, and some of the people who went through it are mothers and fathers today. Most people went through it because the puberty is starting earlier and earlier, and we have girls now who start menstruating when they are 8. I think that's too early, and I am grateful they have found a safe and harmless way of delaying the puberty so that the girl gets time to grow a bit before the crap starts. If it can be used to let people figure out whether they are boys or girls - or neither - wonderful.


"when the left demanded that confused old men in dresses be allowed into the same restrooms as little girls"

So your dad is not allowed to use the same bathroom as your daughters? I suppose that's never a problem in your home, but you forget that not everyone is a millionaire. Living in their dad's attic.

Nevertheless, we were thinking more about young people and adults, who look indistinguishable from other young people and adults using the bathroom, and who use the bathroom to relieve themselves and perhaps check their outfit. I don't know what guys do in their bathroom, but I assume they look at the other... patrons... as much - or little - as the gals do. Most people use the toilets because they have to pee. Why do you use toilets? Why do you assume it's just perverts, "old geezers in dress", men "dressed as a woman" who want to go to ladies' room to ogle at the women? Have you ever been in ladies' room? You might need to visit a couple, to see that there is nothing to see.



Pronouns... in some languages the pronouns aren't gender based. We have managed quite fine through thousands of years. It's not important. 

"If things keep going the way they are, don’t be surprised if in a few years, you see a bill on the House floor—likely with “Ocasio-Cortez” and “Tlaib” written somewhere on it—that forbids all parents to assign their babies gender identities at birth."

Sounds wonderful! Though I think it might be Ilhan Omar, not Rashida Tlaib, who does that.
BTW, there you have two of these Muslim families who are well adjusted and not radical Islamist terrorists. Not that one would know, considering how you talk about them.

But, how has the fact that you didn't get a genderless upbringing effect you? What do you think are the benefits and the downsides? How do you think your life would be different had you been treated as "neutral" when you were a child? How do you think Ivanka's life would be different had she been treated as "neutral"?
What about your children? How are you raising the girls and boys differently? How much differently are you treating them because of their gender? Or do you treat them as the individuals they are, according to how they express themselves, what they want to do, what they want to wear, etc.? How much differently would you treat Kai if she was a boy?

"And don’t be surprised when it gets passed. Like every other crazy idea that the left has had — from the Green New Deal and free college to prison voting and unlimited abortions — this one will come from the far left and then creep slowly but surely toward the center."  

None of those ideas is crazy. You might even be thankful for "prison voting" one day.

"I also have a problem when people start saying, as some researchers have been saying over the past few months, that trans people are being discriminated against because straight people don’t want to date them. I’m a live-and-let-live type of guy. I’m fine with people transitioning, using different pronouns, and referring to themselves with whatever names they see fit. But men shouldn’t be branded transphobic, homophobic, or bigoted just because they’re not lining up to date women with beards and penises."

They aren't. They are branded transphobic because they claim women who don't have beards and penises have them. Because they call people like Caitlyn Jenner "a confused old man in a dress".

No, the problem with "I would never date a transperson!" is that you never know whom you fall in love with.
It's assuming being born a male or female means you have some qualities, characteristics, what ever - that "men are from Mars and women are from Venus", when in reality all that is more a societal expectations and treatment, and the individual characteristics are stronger than any gender related.
It's assuming there's something "essentially female" or "male", that people are born with, and that every female/male born share, that makes the genders different.
It is assuming there's "female experience" no "male born" can ever understand, or "male experience" no "female born" can understand. This is total bullshit. No two women share the "female experience", it's all different to all of us, even sisters have different experience of being a woman in the world.
Transphobia goes beyond transpeople. The underlying attitudes and prejudices excuse sexism, chauvinism, transphobia, misogyny and misandry, as "natural reactions" to these inborn qualities. It excuses bullying tomboys for being "too boyish", and the male equivalent for being "too girly". It is in the bottom of teenagers being "confused" on if they are girls or boys. Transpeople have known their whole life. Most say they were about 3, 4, 5, when they started to protest the "wrong" gender expectations. It doesn't come when one is a teenager and starts getting the brunt of patriarchal society and "being a woman" might be a problem.

And when you can't see if the woman is trans or cis, you are physically attracted to her - then... it really doesn't make any sense to say you aren't attracted to transwomen. 

Now, there are other reasons to why you wouldn't want to date a transperson. For example, you want to marry and get children. A transperson will probably not be able to give you any. Is the hassle really worth it? Or you simply aren't attracted to the person. I'm not attracted to every guy out there, even though I'm straight! Date who ever you want! Really, I'm sure transwomen wouldn't want to date a transphobe either. 

But for goodness' sake, own your phobias and aversions!
It's OK to be transphobic! It's not OK to try to hide the transphobia by being an a-hole.

"For too long, we have allowed the laws of our nation to be written by its most aggrieved, least stable citizens. We’ve pandered to ideas that have no basis in reality because we know that the people who came up with those ideas will turn the social justice mob on us if we don’t."

Excuse me, what? The Congress and the President are "the most aggrieved, least stable citizens of your nation"? WTF? Don't you think that's going a bit too far in your eagerness to bash the Democrats?

No, your attack on transpeople has nothing to do with the Democrats, and don't stick to softball, because the girls would kick your ass there too.

 

Sunday, December 6, 2020

Junior is Triggered, part XI


  "My father didn’t take a lot of time to make good on his campaign promises. On the first day he sat behind the Resolute desk, he began signing executive orders..."


...trying to cancel everything Obama worked for, and attack everything dear to the Democrats. Like the environment. Makes me almost believe Covid is God's way to stop him from destroying the nature.
No, just think about it. So many people praying daily to God to save USA, and then Covid happens. Could be just a coincident, but...

"The ban was temporary, and it wouldn’t have allowed spying on Muslims who live peacefully in this country, as the fake news would have had you believe."

Hmm... who said it would? Looks like another strawman. (Besides... define "peacefully" >:-> USA once locked thousands of peacefully living Japanese heritage Americans into concentration camps, because they "must" be "dangerous".)

The problem with the Muslim ban was not that your dad tried to protect USA from terrorism. That's totally fine. The problem was - as usual - 

* the rhetoric - using language to paint all Muslims terrorists, and all terrorism Islamic. The violence, harassment, and discrimination of "Muslims who live peacefully in this country" has increased, and you aren't doing anything to stop it. On the contrary. You keep attacking Ilhan Omar and speaking of her being a Muslim as if it explained why she's "bad", you call president Obama "Muslim" - as if it was something bad - and then you claim NOT to be islamophobic. Sure. Keep attacking Ilhan Omar because she's Social Liberal, but keep her religious beliefs out of it. Barack Obama is not and has never been a Muslim, but even if he was, it shouldn't mean anything, unless you think Muslims are somehow collectively "bad".

* ignoring the efforts of the people working on the customs, borders, embassies, Homeland Security, immigration; existing laws and structure; everything that was already being done - not knowing what happens, and not caring either

* creating plans and actions based on his assumptions and misconceptions totally ignoring what people who actually know what is happening, are saying.

The Islamophobic Administration

U.S. Muslims Concerned About Their Place in Society, but Continue to Believe in the American Dream

FACT CHECK: Trump's Tweets On Christians, ISIS And Vetting Miss The Bigger Picture

What Are ‘Terrorism-Related’ Offenses Trump Claims Foreigners Commit?

"The Worldwide War Against Christians"

As if.

"The bias against Christians on the part of the left and liberal lawmakers is bad, but at least liberals tend to just whine, while terrorists actually act on it."

You know, I have seen liberals more in church than you and your dad. All the pictures of your dad praying look staged, while the pictures of President Obama praying look real.

Also, the left's "bias against Christians" is justly critiquing unacceptable behavior and people standing up for what they believe, but the "Christians" they "whine" about, being assholes, of course make it all about "I'm just an innocent victim, and look at all those bad people being mean to me, I have done NOTHING!!!" Typical right wing refusal to take any responsibility of your own actions and words, typical Fascist lack of theory of mind.

"Each month 345 Christians are killed and 219 are imprisoned because of their faith"

Are they? By whom? 

I haven't been able to find any more information about this except the Christian site Open Doors.
I also haven't been able to find a "world watch list" for the violence, discrimination and suppression against any other religion. 

Also, the reports by Open Doors and other organizations, even the Christians themselves, who live in these so called extremely dangerous countries, don't support the claims. How have they received information from North Korea, for example? Are they aware of that there are churches in North Korea where people go? Totally in public, in bright daylight? There is only one mosque, in the Iranian embassy.

But let's assume they are correct. Where does this happen, and by whom?

“The primary cause of persecution is Islamic oppression,” Open Doors stated.

No, they didn't. They said “In seven out of the top 10 World Watch List coun­tries, the primary cause of persecution is Islamic oppression." 

Interesting to me is that two of the seven mainly Islamic countries on the top 10 list are  not on Trump's "terrorist country" list. Afghanistan, and Pakistan.
Why is this interesting? President Trump mentioned the 2015 San Bernardino attack, and the perps had roots in Pakistan. Osama bin Laden was caught in Pakistan. Why isn't Pakistan on the list?

Donald Trump's Call With Pakistan Was a Hypocritical Mess

In the rest of the top 10 World Watch List countries, the causes of persecution are
1) the country doesn't approve of any religions [China, North Korea (#1 perp)]
2) the country doesn't approve any but the main religion (which is basically the reason for harassment in those 7 Islamic countries) (this is why Christians are being harassed in India)

In Eritrea those who mostly harass Christians belong to the main stream nationally approved Christian denomination. They persecute Christian minorities.

“This means, for millions of Christians—particularly those who grew up Muslim or were born into Muslim families—openly following Jesus can have painful consequences.”

One has to understand one thing here.
To a Muslim, an "infidel" is not someone who never was a Muslim, it's an apostate. Someone who was born a Muslim or at one point of their lives chose to be a Muslim. Someone who received the "gospel", but rejects it. An unfaithful, disloyal. They are seen as renegades and traitors, and according to the law of the country, they should be killed.
It is only extreme Muslims who persecute born Christians and Christian immigrants and foreigners. 

Considering that Trump loves to call people traitors and demands death penalty for various crimes; and that Trumpettes threaten people with execution and lynching, and Christian politicians are asking for death penalty for "crimes against God's laws", like homosexuality, witchcraft, and abortion, I think it's hypocritical of Christians to cry when the Muslims make God's law the law of the country. That is what Sharia law is, God's immutable divine law. 

Now, I'm not saying it's not bad, because it is, but I'm saying that the American right is trying to push their version of Sharia law in place, and it's just as bad. Considering that Trump is trying to push "alternative execution methods", so who knows when Americans start beheading people as punishment for their sins.

But, yet another example of fascist lacking theory of mind. "It's only bad when it happens to me, not when I'm doing it".

Which leads me to the next point with all of this. It doesn't matter what some other people do in other countries. What matters is what Americans do in America.

It doesn't matter if hundreds of Christians are persecuted all over the world. It matters whom YOU persecute. Christians aren't persecuted as a group in USA and Europe, so when the Left decries religious persecution and points at the Muslims, they are correct. The Muslims are more persecuted in USA than Christians. The Christians' rights aren't violated - so much so, that they have to invent hurt and violations. "We are not allowed to say "Merry Christmas"!" "People get mad at me when I refuse to do my job of religious reasons, and then boycott my store!" "It's my religious right not to wear mask!" "I'm not crying, you are!"

"one whose ideas we are prohibited from criticizing, even if we’re not criticizing the people themselves"

*sigh* "Hate the sin, not the sinner", huh? Let's kill all the disgusting gays, because you love the sinner, and hate their sin? Sure. I doubt even you believe that crap. 

I spent years trying to explain people that it is not antisemitism to criticize Israel for the human and civil rights violations they are guilty of, and that it is of course totally fine to boycott Israeli products and wares, as a protest against these violations, but when you start calling them "the Jewish state", and accusing all the Jews of being pro-Israeli and anti-Palestinian by proxy, and saying Zionism is racism, and other such things, quoting the Protocolls of the Elders of Zion, and presenting conspiracy theories about Jews controlling the world economy, press and USonian politicians, then you are being an antisemite. 

The same way, one can condemn Islamic terrorism, Islamic antisemitism, such disgusting "traditions", like marrying children, gender mutilation, misogyny, violations of human rights under the guise of Sharia, etc. without being Islamophobic.

It is totally fine to criticize individuals, but not a whole people. "Muslims" are not a monolithic group of people who all think alike, just as "Christians" or "Americans" aren't. Or blue-collar workers, or New Yorkers. 

"This has made it impossible to have anything resembling a real debate about radical Islam without being shut down or called a racist."

No, what has made it impossible to have anything resembling a real debate about radical Islam, is that some people believe every Muslim, except a few exceptions, who basically just confirm the rule, are radical Islamists and terrorists, and refuse to even listen to anything that claims anything different. It's when you do that, when you are called a racist. Or most likely Islamophobe. Because that's what you are. (But it's just words, and you shouldn't be sheltered from hearing uncomfortable truths, according to your own words. But truth hurts and you can't take it, so here we are.)


 "Obama ordered his entire administration to use the phrase “violent extremism” so as not to hurt the feelings of murderous cowards who strap suicide vests on pregnant women and sell children as sex slaves."

No, Obama ordered his entire administration to use the phrase "violent extremism", because it is violent extremism, so as not to make innocent people who has never even said an unkind word to a fellow human beings targets of misdirected outrage. 

And also, because he was speaking of all kinds of violent extremism, not just the Islamic one. I do hope you agree that ALL violent extremism, right wing, left wing, Islamic, White Supremacist, what ever, is to be condemned hard and without hesitation and doubt.

"...to counter  hateful extremist ideologies that radicalize, recruit or incite to violence.  Violent extremist threats can come from a range of groups and individuals, including domestic terrorists and homegrown violent extremists in the United States, as well as terrorist groups like al-Qaeda and ISIL."
Obama's White House Press Release

Let's say, "you had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides".

"Last Easter in Sri Lanka, radical Islamic terrorists wearing suicide vests entered churches and other places where Christians were celebrating the holiday and detonated the devices. Some 250 people, mostly Christians, were blown to bits. Another 500 were wounded. When Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton finally got around to offering their condolences, they did so like this: “The attacks on tourists and Easter worshippers in Sri Lanka are an attack on humanity,” the former president tweeted."

"When they finally got around to offering their condolences"... Hmmm
They tweeted about 4 hours later than the President of the country. When Obama was the President, he always posted first, without anyone berating those who posted after him. I think people should have the right to sleep a little longer on Easter Sunday morning, but you apparently don't. Nancy Pelosi, Barack Obama, and Elizabeth Warren all posted about 7 A.M. Hillary Clinton posted a couple of hours later. After the Sunday sermon. She probably heard of it then.
When did you post your condolences, and what did you say? The Internet has no record of you saying anything.

Nancy Pelosi
"Today’s heartbreaking attacks in Sri Lanka come as the country has worked hard to build a common future after years of war. Our thoughts are with the injured & the families of those killed in today’s Easter Sunday attacks."

Barack Obama
"The attacks on tourists and Easter worshippers in Sri Lanka are an attack on humanity. On a day devoted to love, redemption, and renewal, we pray for the victims and stand with the people of Sri Lanka."

Elizabeth Warren
"I'm heartsick for the victims of today's terrorist attacks in Sri Lanka. Hundreds have been killed and wounded. To slaughter worshippers at church during Easter service is an act of great evil. My thoughts and my prayers are with the victims and their loved ones." 

Hillary Clinton
"On this holy weekend for many faiths, we must stand united against hatred and violence. I'm praying for everyone affected by today's horrific attacks on Easter worshippers and travelers in Sri Lanka."

Kamala Harris
Easter is a reminder that there is hope and rebirth even in the darkest of times. We must remember that today, more than ever.

I am horrified by the attacks in Sri Lanka, where so many families were celebrating such a joyous day. Praying for the victims and their loved ones.

Bernie Sanders
"Our hearts go out to the victims and families of the horrific attacks in Sri Lanka. No person should have to fear for their life in their place of worship. We must work to bring this world together around our common humanity." 

Tulsi Gabbard
"My heart is with Sri Lanka on this #EasterSunday, w/hundreds killed & wounded in a horrific attack as they gathered in prayer. On a day devoted to love & peace, may we remember Jesus Christ’s message of love - for God & for each other - as we commit to defeating hate with love." 

Cory Booker
“The Apostle Paul wrote, ‘Rejoice with those who rejoice, weep with those who weep,'” Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) tweeted early Sunday morning. “. On a day meant for celebration, so many families in Sri Lanka are devastated, and my heart breaks along with theirs. There’s absolutely no justification for this.”

 What did you dear Leader say:

"Heartfelt condolences from the people of the US to the people of Sri Lanka on the horrible terrorist attacks on churches and hotels that have killed at least 138 million people and badly injured 600 more. We stand ready to help."

No mention of Christians there. Not even as "Easter worshippers". 

"Easter worshippers?

Are they kidding?

What would they have called them if it had happened on December 25? Christmas carolers? Why don’t they just slap the victims’ families in the face?"

No, they are not kidding. You are just an ignorant asshole making fuss over nothing.

“Easter worshipper” is not in any way a “weird” or “belittling” way of saying it. It might be unusual, and a lot of people might not have noticed it before much ado was made about it, big fuss, mountain of a molehill, simply because it was Obama who said it.

"A crash in the gallery of the Italian Roman Catholic Church of St. Michael, in Lawrence Street, near Tillary Street Brooklyn, during the celebration of solemn high mass yesterday morning, precipitated a panic among the 600 Easter worshippers that might have had serious results if it had not been for the efforts of calmer minds to quiet the fears of the excited ones."
- The New York Times, 1910

"There are special church services, crowded with holiday worshippers"
- Appendix to the Congressional Record, 1947

"The most gorgeous cathedral, filled with holiday worshippers, is not more pleasing in my recollection than that noble landscape by which we were surrounded"
- George Seddon · 1998

"On Sunday, two suicide bombers targeted the Christian church packed with Christmas worshippers, killing at least nine and injuring more than 30 others."
- Big News Network, 2017

"Easter worshippers encouraged to pray for Sri Lankan bombing victims"
- Winchester Star, April 22, 2019

"Tourists, Easter worshippers lament closure of Notre Dame"
- Fox News, April 20, 2019

There are tons of other instances, but I think that should suffice.

The thing is that the attack was directed not at all Christians, but explicitly those Christians who were worshiping God in churches on Easter Sunday. That is, Easter worshippers.
As has been pointed out several times, only Christians celebrate Easter.

The target was not the Christians who celebrated Easter, it was the Christians who worshiped on Easter. Plenty of Sri Lankan Christians celebrated Easter at home. Only those who were in those churches. Worshiping. On Easter. Easter worshippers.

And as President Obama pointed out, it wasn’t only the Easter worshippers who were hurt in the attack, there were also people there who weren’t there because they were Christian. Four hotels full of tourists on vacation were bombed as well. 46 foreigners were killed. Who knows if they were Christian.

Frankly, everyone who said “Easter worshippers” and didn’t mention the tourists, even as “other victims”, were talking ONLY about the Christian victims.

Also, the “I worship Jesus, not Easter!” is ridiculous. No-one has said you worship Easter. How ever did you even think it would mean that? President Obama and Hillary Clinton are Christian people, whether you accept it or not.

But what did other Conservatives say?

Donald Trump jr.
Nothing

Sean Hannity
Not a word

Mich McConnell
"I’m grieved this Easter Sunday by the horrific terrorist attacks on Christian churches and hotels in Sri Lanka that have killed hundreds and wounded many more.
These attacks are a tragic reminder of the continuing and global threat posed by terrorists. We stand with Sri Lanka in prayer, in mourning, and in solidarity against this evil enemy."

Mitt Romney
"As we celebrate the miracle of Easter, we hold in our hearts the victims of the senseless violence in Sri Lanka and their loved ones. We pray that they may experience God’s eternal grace, comfort and love."

Bill Weld:
"Leslie and I are horrified by the reports of the terrorist attacks in #SriLanka this Easter morning.  Our hearts and prayers go out to all the victims and their families, and to the entire Sri Lankan nation for the trauma they have suffered on a day that should have been a time for prayer and joyful worship. Nothing can match the horror of this cold-blooded, calculating slaughter of innocents on such a holy day. The perpetrators are subhuman cowards and must be held fully accountable for the tragedy they have caused.

There is no what so ever difference in the tone and wording of Democrats and Republicans, except that the Democrats actually said something, while most Republicans didn't even bother.

So, what about the Christchurch mosque shooting?

Mitch McConnell
I join all Americans in sending our deepest sympathies to the people of Christchurch, New Zealand, as they mourn the victims of yesterday's horrific acts of terror.
There is no room for hate and violence in our society, least of all in the places we turn for mercy and compassion.
So today, we stand with the New Zealand Muslim community and the faithful of the Linwood and Al Noor mosques in their hour of grief, and pray that all faith communities sustain each other on the healing road ahead.

Kamala Harris
My heart is heavy with grief for New Zealand & Muslims worldwide affected by the tragic murders in Christchurch. The massacre of those in a house of worship, in prayer, is evil & cowardly. We stand with our friends around the world to condemn hate & speak out against intolerance. 

Bernie Sanders
"Our thoughts are with the victims of the horrific attack in Christchurch, New Zealand. No one should have to fear for their life because of their religion. We must come together to condemn all forms of hate and violence to build a future of respect and understanding." 

Cory Booker
"I’m sickened by the news coming out of New Zealand—the horrific terrorist attack targeting Muslims at prayer that killed at least 49 people.
The rising tide of white supremacy and Islamophobia around the globe must be met with our determination to work against hate."

Barack Obama
"Michelle and I send our condolences to the people of New Zealand. We grieve with you and the Muslim community. All of us must stand against hatred in all its forms."

Melania Trump
"My deepest condolences to the families who lost loved ones in the horrific shooting. We pray & grieve with you and stand against all of the hatred."

Donald Trump
Breitbart News Network https://t.co/HdGfwuASWC via @BreitbartNews

Then he deleted that, and posted
"My warmest sympathy and best wishes goes out to the people of New Zealand after the horrible massacre in the Mosques. 49 innocent people have so senselessly died, with so many more seriously injured. The U.S. stands by New Zealand for anything we can do. God bless all!"

BTW, the Whitechurch shooter called Trump "a symbol of renewed white identity and common purpose". Now, I know that's just one man's opinion and it has nothing to do with Donald Trump, but if a Muslim terrorist said something similar about Obama, you would be all over it, tweeting, and retweeting, as if it was evidence of something.

"Take the coverage of Omar Mateen, for instance. He’s the monster who a couple of years back walked into the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, Florida, and shot and killed forty-nine innocent people. He committed the act in the name of radical Islam. We know that because he told us so." 

He told us so? Then it must be true! When has a terrorist ever lied?
Then there's also the fact that he was active on gay dating sites, a friend said they used to go to gay clubs together when they were in the police academy, he asked a couple of class mates (male) out, several guests had seen him at the club, several times, even his family said they "didn't know". It was only his father who vehemently denied him being gay, but also his father thinks homosexuality is a sin. And it was a gay club. But, surely this could have nothing to do with anything, it is impossible he would have invented the Muslim terrorist excuse to save his dad of the humiliation of having to admit his son was gay. 

"Remember the Fort Hood shooter? The radical Islamic army major who shot and killed thirteen people at a military base? CNN labeled him only as an “army psychiatrist,” with no mention of his religion or his extremist views, which had been documented in uncovered emails."

Fox News labels him also only as an "army psychiatrist". Most everyone does. And everyone mentions his religion and his extremist views also, after they became known.

I believe it was a terrorist attack, and the survivors should have received all the benefits that come with surviving a terrorist attack. And I am more left than Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
Also, no-one was lamenting the death sentence, or getting outraged over the decision of shaving him violating his religious freedom, or being "an usual and cruel punishment".

"When some homegrown piece-of-shit militia group commits a terrorist act, however, the press will run out of ink calling its members Christians."

 I wonder what those people think about you calling them "homegrown piece-of-shit militia". They are a big part of your voters. You should have some respect. Though they probably can't read, so it's pretty safe to call them anything you like in a book.

That their religion is mentioned is usually because they are Christians, and because the right wing press will run out of ink calling any and every terrorist Muslim, unless something else can be proven, so if someone commits an act of terrorism, it's best to be quick to prove he's not a Muslim, because otherwise the Right will say he is.

"Even its use of the phrase “white supremacist” is a lightly veiled pseudonym for “Christian.” 

Only when they are Christian. There's quite a big group of Asatruende, and other Aryan Pagans there. In my mind they all are, because Christianity is a branch of Judaism, how ever twisted with Indoeuropean myths, and there is nothing there that could be used to justify in any way the White Man's supremacy over rest of the world, or any other activity White Supremacists engage in. Fascism only USES Christianity to keep the masses down, it doesn't follow the Christian teachings and values. They invent their own interpretations, using the Orwellian doublespeak, and just as they appropriate "Christmas", they use the Cherrypicked Christian term to describe their own Germanic Paganism.

"It’s the Christians, they say, who bomb abortion clinics, but it’s an army psychiatrist, not a radical Islamic, who murders more than a dozen people in cold blood."

Frankly, I don't think his blood was cold. But if you bomb abortion clinics because you believe it to be your Christian duty, then it should be mentioned you are Christian. If you shoot your fellow soldiers because you believe it's your Muslim duty, it should be mentioned.

"It’s an evangelical who attacks gays, but it’s a closet homosexual who kills dozens of people in a nightclub."

If the person kills gays because it's against his religion, then it should be said. If he kills gays because he has some sort of twisted psychological reasons due to the fact that he's gay, then that should be said also. Now, Omar Mateen is known as an Islamist terrorist, not as a gay guy who went berserk on a gay club. 

"It’s a white nationalist Christian who attacks a mosque, but it’s a man with a troubled mind who kills his coworkers in San Bernardino."

It was a white nationalist Christian who attacked a mosque. Why wouldn't it be said? He was very open about it.
San Bernardino is generally classified as an Islamic terrorist attack, even though... he was working there, and it was Inland Regional Center's Christmas party - "a government-funded not-for-profit public benefit corporation that provides services and programs to more than 33,000 people with developmental disabilities and their families in California's San Bernardino and Riverside Counties."
That doesn't sound like a probable target for Islamist terrorists, I have to say... 

I mean, the Boston Marathon bombing was obviously a terror attack - random killing in places with a lot of bystanders, perfect to strike fear to the hearts of people - and no-one is denying it was islamist, even though at the beginning no-one knew who did it. (North Korea was suspected initially.)

"During the campaign, I sent out a tweet that had a photo of a bowl of rainbow-colored Skittles accompanied by the following text: “If I had a bowl of skittles and I told you just three would kill you. Would you take a handful? That’s our Syrian refugee problem.”

As metaphors go, I didn’t think it was so terrible. Maybe not F. Scott Fitzgerald, but not bad for a guy with a business degree from Wharton, right?"

You stole it from feminists :-D. Or probably got it from someone who stole it.

You know how men reacted to that? 

"These same people now object to the Skittles comparison. The analogy is identical: a handful of members of a group engage in violence that terrifies a portion of the population. That portion then fears the group in general because they cannot tell which members are safe and which pose a threat.

The only difference is that males are an acceptable target. It is okay to fear men. It is okay to hate men. It is okay to imply that until proven otherwise all men are rapists.

But you cannot say this of Syrian refugees. They have nuanced experiences. Most of them pose no threat to anyone. It is unconscionable to distrust them over a handful of bad actors."

The analogy is identical. I fully acknowledge your fear. But when the women who has been raped (20% of all women), dare to go out, go to work, interact with men, without demanding men are locked up or banned from the public space, why would you be sheltered and pampered, because you are afraid? It wouldn't be fair to "punish" the 90 men who hasn't raped a woman, because of the 10 who has, so why would it be fair to "punish" the 97 Syrian refugees, for the POSSIBLE crimes of 3? Your chance of meeting a terrorist is a lot smaller than a woman's chance of meeting a rapist.

After all, it was you who said: "If I’ve learned one thing about children—and human beings in general—it’s that they can thrive only when they’re challenged. Just as your muscles won’t grow if you don’t put them under the stress of weight lifting and your mind won’t expand if you don’t fill it with difficult thoughts, books, and arguments, people can’t grow if they’re not made uncomfortable, or at least challenged, sometimes."

Maybe you just need to stop being a fucking coward and see the refugees and Muslims as people, just like the blue-collar workers and union men you befriended. 

Women's March Organizer Linda Sarsour Spoke of 'Jihad.' But She Wasn't Talking About Violence

Again, you get upset because you assume words must mean something they don't mean. And she even took care of illustrating her meaning with a story. Jihad doesn't mean "holy war".  

"As it stands right now, the ideas contained in radical Islamic fundamentalism are completely at odds with the basic tenets of Western civilization."

ALL radical fundamentalism is completely at odds with everything of value.

American Christian fundamentalist radicalism

"Now before people in the fake-news media take me out of context and get too carried away, let me be crystal clear: I am not talking about the vast majority of Muslim people around the world"

Good. Don't. But your supporters are. So maybe you need to be more careful and remember to mention you are talking about radical Islamic fundamentalim, and not about Ilhan Omar or Linda Sarsour, who belong to the "vast majority of Muslim people around the world", and are not radical Islamic fundamentalists.

"If we aren’t free to criticize radical Islam on its merits and to speak freely about what’s wrong with people who subscribe to it blindly and do bad things in its name"

You are

"We’ve been told for so long, usually in the aftermath of some monstrous Islamist attack on the civilized world, that Islam is a religion of peace, but we must also acknowledge that there is a radical element that would kill you, me, and even the trans hippie who’s eating a vegan kale salad right now."

You only talk about the radical element. We know there are radical islamists and islamist terrorists who cause a lot of destruction and kill people. We know extreme right Muslim countries use Sharia law to control their countries.

"Even the ones like this man [the San Bernardino shooter] who came to the United States legally"

Yeah... he was born in the USA. Can't come more legally than that.

Guess which other terrorists were also born in the USA? Patrick Crusius, James Alex Fields Jr., Dylann Storm Roof, Timothy McVeigh, Terry Nichols...



"Why do liberals go out of their way to apologize for or excuse radical Islam while at the same time they condemn Christians, masculinity, family values, and the American way of life? You can’t have it both ways!"

I think you have misunderstood the "can't have it both ways". Because right now you are saying they are basically the same thing.

I live in an area with a lot of Middle Eastern refugees and immigrants. A lot of them are "Sweden Democrats". Basically Nazis. Not the Muslim ones. The Christian ones. They also whine about "liberals condemning Christians, masculinity, family values, and the American way of life"

Now, I wonder if he is going to say what he thinks is "family values" and "the American way of life"...

I suppose it's just what ever he thinks it is, so that he can attack liberals for "condemning" it. 

"By definition, however, a disagreement has two sides. If one side engages in a full-out war of misinformation, hurtful invectives, and physical violence toward the other, it’s not a disagreement.

It’s called hate."

Full-out war of misinformation? You mean, "alternative facts"? Check
hurful invective? You mean, like "sleepy liberal losers, socialist crybabies, and hypocritical politicians and media", "the left, who are just a bunch of oversensitive babies who find everything offensive" "So-called activists on the extreme left have moved from their safe spaces and the basements of their parents’ houses out into the streets", "the trans hippie who’s eating a vegan kale salad right now", and such? Check
Physical violence toward the other? Check

Cars have hit demonstrators 104 times since George Floyd protests began

"'I was trying to have a conversation with them,' he said.

'You can obviously see from the way they're chanting and the things they say that they were just looking to beat up any white guy with a MAGA hat.

'These are Maoist terrorists,' he added.

'They are not Americans. They are not liberals. They are Maoists, and they will attack you, they will hurt you, they want to burn down this United States. Even if Joe Biden wins, they will not stop. Don't you understand me?'"

David, a former US marine called the cops to escort him home because he was so afraid of the "Maoist terrorists".

So - The Right hates the Left and BLM.
BTW, really scary looking mob those BLM protesters. I have to say that that MAGA hat guy looks the most dangerous of them all. 

"Nowhere is this upside-down thinking by the left more evident than in the way Christians are treated in our country today."

Well... there are Christians... and then there are CINOs. And then there are the FFF "Christians". Christians are wonderful people. CINOs are not. And FFFs have no place in a civilized society. 



"There were those who said he had chosen Judge Barrett solely because she was a woman, an olive branch to the crazed left-wing feminists in Congress."

Must have been some idiot Rightie. No-one who knows Amy Coney Barrett and "crazed left-wing feminists in Congress" (What a way to speak about the elected representatives of the people of United States. I bet you think you respect women. As long as they stay in their place...) would have thought so.

And you don't get points knocked off because you were a "traitor", you don't get woke points because you aren't woke. Gender is irrelevant.

My father has hired women for major roles for about as long as Joe Biden has been rubbing their shoulders and letting out hot breath onto their necks—which is to say, a very long time.

*sigh* Does this asshole think his language is not insulting, abusive and hurtful?
So, about for as long as Trump's been glaring and grabbing at half-naked teenaged girls and young women, because no-one dared to stop him?

Donald Trump, a champion of women? His female employees think so. 

Well... Amy Coney Barrett is against abortion, GLBTQA+ people, and birth control. That is being a threat to civil, constitutional, and reproductive rights. You call it "being interested in expanding possibilities for only some women", and I call it being interested in expanding possibilities of the women who want to have their possibilities expanded.

"ACLU which stopped fighting for the civil liberties of all Americans a long time ago"

People deem ACLU's impartiality by two factors.
1) Whether they see themselves as potentially being accused with their help, or have their plant thwarted;, or whether they see themselves as potentially needing their help
or
2) if you needed their help and didn't get it.
Which one are you?

"It was Judge Barrett’s religion, however, that the Senate committee targeted."

Yes. She's a fundamentalist. 

“Indeed, it lived loudly in the hearts of those who founded our nation as one where citizens could practice their faith freely and without apology.”

Yes, practice. Not force everyone else to practice that faith, too.

"In November 2018, senators Kamala Harris of California and Mazie Hirono from Hawaii suggested that Brian Buescher, my father’s nominee for the US district court in Nebraska, be disqualified because he belonged to the Knights of Columbus"

Knights of Columbus, "The Knights promote the Catholic view on public policy issues, including opposition to same-sex marriage, abortion, and birth control." The US law makes all of them legal, and if a person might get into a conflict between following the law and following their personal conviction and beliefs, they should choose their beliefs, and knowing this, they should not accept a position where they might get into a conflict like this. 

It's like Kim Davis. She should have quit her job when gay marriage became legal, because she knew she wouldn't be able to follow the law and do her job. 


 "Hey, Sheldon, you remember anything about separation of church and state?"

Do you? Or do Christians not need to separate church and state?
And remember Rev. Jeremiah Wright?

 "The left in this country has completely forgotten the Judeo-Christian values on which the United States was founded.  Democrats forget that the only reason we have a country in the first place is because a bunch of people got onto a ship and sailed here from England so they could practice their religion freely. Then, when it came time to write their laws, they looked to the Ten Commandments for guidance.

Separation of church and state in this country means that the government can’t tell people what faith they can practice. It doesn’t stop people from making laws based on their religious beliefs."

John Adams disagreed with you on that. And I think I'd rather take his word on it than yours. After all, he was there when it happened...

“the impious presumption of legislators and rulers, civil as well as ecclesiastical, who, being themselves but fallible and uninspired men, have assumed dominion over the faith of others, setting up their own opinions and modes of thinking as the only true and infallible, and as such endeavoring to impose them on others, hath established and maintained false religions over the greatest part of the world and through all time.”
- Thomas Jefferson

No, the Right has forgotten the values on which the United States was founded, and try to push their own as the Founders'. Just the same way as you push your own values as "Judeo-Christian". 

Separation of church and state doesn't stop people from making laws based on their religious beliefs, IF THE PEOPLE AGREES ON IT, which is what Democracy means. The people choose the law makers, to try to represent them according to their best ability. 

You keep forgetting Hillary got the popular vote. Donald Trump doesn't have the people behind him. He is the President because of the electorate college, not by the will of the people. He should think a little about what the people wants, in stead of doing what ever he likes. Now he lost the election again, and this time he won't even have the electoral college. 

BTW, could you recite the 10 commandments? Do you think you and your daddy keep them? Especially Jesus' Annotated Version?

There are six things that the LORD strongly dislikes, seven that are an abomination to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that make haste to run to evil, a false witness who breathes out lies, and one who sows discord among brothers.
— Proverbs 6:16–19

This whole book is "a lying tongue, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that make haste to run to evil, a false witness who breathes out lies, and one who sows discords among brothers". I'd say "haughty eyes" as well. A lot of bragging and arrogance there...
So the fruit of your tree proves you are not a Christian. 


 "No one, for instance, has asked Ilhan Omar in a public forum whether or not she married her brother to commit immigration fraud."

No-one has asked you whether you married your sister to commit immigration fraud either. Did you?
BTW, who IS your real father?
Did your mother commit immigration fraud to birth you in the USA?
Were you born in the USA? Do you have your a birth certificate? No, a REAL birth certificate, and not that fake one your "dad" bought.

1/3 of USonians believe Obama is a Muslim. They are "deeply uncomfortable", because they believe Obama is a Muslim, that the “dogma” of Islam “lives loudly” within him, and therefore he is a terrorist, or at least supports terrorists, and they are quite open and loud about this.
I haven't heard you say a word of rebuke to them.
Even though you should know he isn't a Muslim, and even if he was, it shouldn't matter.
At least if one believes you, and you seriously believe that most Muslims are fine, ordinary, peace-loving people who just want to get on with their lives and have caused no-one ever any trouble, why would people be so worried and uncomfortable about Obama's perceived religion?
So... I find it hard to believe you.

"At the time, the fact that we had any support in the Jewish community was baffling to many pundits."

I wonder. Most people who know the American Jewry, know they are like any other Americans. Some are Conservative, some are Liberal. There is no monolith "Jewish community" your dad could make promises to. Not every Jew in USA want the same things.

Appointing conservative judges is only pleasing to conservatives, and 3/4 of Jews are Democrats. Half of them are liberal. Only 20% of Jews are Conservative, and most of them are Orthodox Jews.
You could, of course, say, that 3/4 of American Jews aren't Jews.

"He campaigned on restoring fairness in trade and he’s taken the Chinese and other nations head on."

Interesting that you mention this in connection to the Jews... why do you think the Jews would be particularly interested in trade?

"Similarly, he promised to move the United States Embassy to Jerusalem, something which multiple presidents including George Bush, Bill Clinton, Other Bush, and even Barack Obama also promised to do but never delivered."

Barack Obama didn't promise to move the US embassy to Jerusalem. He acknowledged Jerusalem as Israel's capital, which it is, but he said nothing about the embassy.

"Barack Obama made no secret of his disdain for Israeli leadership"

Every decent person disdains Israeli leadership. Supporting the fascist government doesn't make you Israel's friend. Benjamin Netanyahu and Avigdor Lieberman are... Uh.

"When [my dad] makes a promise, he follows through."

Yeah, sure...

Trump’s 40 Biggest Broken Promises

He says "give me a break" and "left lost its mind" five times in this book. Kill your darlings, donny-boy.

"the United States should support the only democracy in the Middle East"

Israel isn't the only democracy in the Middle East.

"You see, the United States is a leader, and others follow us"

Yeah... Guatemala followed you. The rest stayed in Tel Aviv.

"It’s called leadership—something Obama sorely lacked."

No, darling, it's called delusion. Something that has become painfully clear to everyone but you since Biden won the election.

Saturday, December 5, 2020

Junior is Triggered, part X


 "Every time I looked at my Twitter feed or at one of the liberal news networks, all I could see was the enemy. I know it sounds harsh, but there was no doubt they were against us."


No shit, Sherlock. That's how elections work.
Do you seriously think that Hillary's campaign felt any different any time they were looking at one of the conservative news networks?
You lack all theory of mind.

"I heard journalists who were supposed to be objective reporters of the news talking about Hillary’s path to victory, as if she was the only one that mattered in the race. As things began to tighten, it was “we” could still take down Donald Trump if X, Y, and Z happens."

Liberal media is for the liberal candidate? Oh how... obvious? But, no... this is another claim that doesn't have much to do with reality. I have been rewatching CNN's election night reporting (CNN, heavily left leaning with questionable factual reporting, a news channel no-one would call unbiased and neutral), and even though the discussions about what was happening was - obviously - biased - the actual reporting was not.

 "But now, here they were using their platforms on the most important night of the year to push propaganda for the Democrat Party and denigrate Donald Trump on live television."

So... what was it they were saying?  

"Right now, a historic moment, we can now project the winner of the presidential race, CNN projects Donald Trump wins the presidency. The business tycoon and tv personality capping his improbable political journey with astounding upset victory. Donald Trump will become the 45th president of the United States, defeating Hillary Clinton in a campaign unlike anything we've seen in our lifetime"

"The energy that flows through my father is the same energy that flowed through my grandfather and great-grandfather before him. The 2016 Donald J. Trump for President campaign was a hundred years in the making, built on a foundation of American spirit, smarts, and grit."

German, you mean. 

"I’d spent a quarter of my life in Pennsylvania. I thought of all the families I had met and all the sights I could see driving there—boarded-up factories, closed-down coal mines..."

Trump’s Broken Promises on Pennsylvania’s Economy
CAP Action Memo: Trump’s Broken Promises to Pennsylvania
Trump’s Broken Promises Are Hurting Pennsylvania Families

 "That very morning, I was reminded how horrible they could be. With my two-year-old daughter Chloe in my arms and my daughter Kai holding my hand, I’d walked from work to vote at a local public school. On the way, I was called every four-letter word imaginable. You know, tolerant liberals screaming and cursing at me while I had four of my children in tow. To the left, I wasn’t a father, and my kids weren’t children. We weren’t human beings. We were the enemy. If it was just me, I wouldn’t have cared. It’s happened so much to me, I wouldn’t have given it a second thought. You start saying things like that to my kids, well, that’s another matter altogether. I’ve used the hate the left has towards me as motivation. But this was something entirely different."

Why would you take your children with you when you KNEW what was to be expected? You were using them as shield trying to protect you, a grown ass man, from words you didn't want to hear.

And what ever happened to "people can’t grow if they’re not made uncomfortable" and "it's just words"? 


"It was just another sign of their disdain for regular people, which would come back again when my father announced his reelection campaign in Orlando a few years later. Panning the camera over the long line waiting for my father to speak, the anchors would make fun of their flip flops and cargo shorts, wondering if that constituted “formal wear” in Florida."

Who? I haven't been able to find any reference to that. Which network was this? Was it an actual news reporting or an opinion piece? 

"Their hatred of anyone who doesn’t live in New York City or subscribe to their radical ideas was disgusting to me."

No, little-donny, you are taking some words someone might have said or not said - there's absolutely no sources or references of most of the things you claim people said, and when there is, it turns out you have misunderstood half and misquoted the rest, and then you blame the whole media and the Democrat party of this, assigning them agenda, values, thoughts and ideas all according your wild assumptions and speculations.
And that, my darling, is disgusting to me. 

"Right before my eyes, the television anchors were telling me my father was the president-elect. But, if there was one thing I learned in the prior two years, it was that the Clintons were not about to roll over and die. Too much was at stake. More than even the presidency. A global network of power that they’d spent decades building was in peril.

I stood there in front of the television, in the place I’d grown up, with the people I cared about most in the world, and shook my head.

“No,” I said, first to myself and then to the others in the kitchen. “No! They are not going to give in.”

No matter what the results said, they would come up with some kind of trick to snatch the victory away. They would say the system had been rigged, that the voting machines were all wrong, that some of the ballots had been smudged and didn’t count. “They’ll come up with something,” I said. “Just watch.”

That entire night, I waited for the other shoe to drop. When John Podesta came out onstage at the Javits Center to announce that everyone would “regroup in the morning,” he confirmed my suspicion. I knew it."

Hillary Clinton called your dad and congratulated him for the victory. She gave her concession speech the next morning. The Democrats accepted they had lost the election, and acknowledged Trump had won. 

Of course they were regrouping. For 2018 and 2020. Life goes on. The Presidential election is just one battle. 

The Russian collusion investigation started already in the summer of 2016. It was not a hoax. You are guilty. You did contact Russia trying to get dirt on Hillary. 

And, frankly, if it was "Hillary's fault", then USA owes her big time for revealing people who didn't mind trying to get foreign powers involved in USA's politics, and you admit she's a better player than you.

Now, this: No matter what the results said, they would come up with some kind of trick to snatch the victory away. They would say the system had been rigged, that the voting machines were all wrong, that some of the ballots had been smudged and didn’t count. “They’ll come up with something,” I said. “Just watch.” is a description of what your dad's side is doing as we speak, 2020.
Not only did you claim the system had been rigged, that the voting machines were all wrong, that some of the ballots didn't count, you are screaming that the election was fraudulent, that the voting machines were built to give the Democrats the victory, that they were using a program designed for Hugo Chavez, that USPS was stealing votes, that the Democrats were bringing in boxes of prefilled ballots, that dead people vote, you are bringing in crisis actors to swear that they saw something nasty in the woodshed ("I signed an affidavit, so everything I say is true!") You are attacking anyone and everyone who says Biden won, you are demanding recounts after recounts, trying to claim that only votes for Trump were real and correct, and every vote for Biden was fake and illegal and invalid. You are harassing people, sending death threats, and doing everything you accused the Democrats of, but 10 times worse, and this time it's the truth.

And then follows more sanctimonious whining. *sigh*

"...we were driving into Arlington National Cemetery, where he was to lay a wreath on the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. I rarely get emotional, if ever. I guess you’d call me hyper-rational, stoic. Yet, as we drove past the rows of white grave markers, in the gravity of the moment, I had a deep sense of the importance of the presidency and a love of our country. I was never prouder of my father than when I watched as he stood before the tomb, his hand over his heart, while the Army bugler played “Taps.”

In that moment, I also thought of all the attacks we’d already suffered as a family, and about all the sacrifices we’d have to make to help my father succeed—voluntarily giving up a huge chunk of our business and all international deals to avoid the appearance that we were “profiting off the office.”
 

You were at Arlington and were comparing political dirt throwing and social media jabber to enemy shooting at soldiers, and your "sacrifices" to soldiers dying at wars? WTF?

Also, while profiting off the office. I know, in tv business, the appearance is everything.
So you will do your best to appear the innocent victim of your evil opponents, and your supporters are buying it, because they want to believe in the narrative. Truth hurts, why admit it, when you can throw a temper tantrum and try to scream everyone silent?

”We also had to give up a lot of domestic business because, as ridiculous as this sounds, we didn’t want to run the risk of our domestic partners being branded racist, misogynistic, or any of the lies and labels the press had manufactured about my dad. ”

yeah, sure



”In one sense, the left and the liberal press effectively put me out of work. All that was left for me to do was spend my time campaigning for my father.”

Frankly, had you just cleanly separated the business and presidency as you should have, there wouldn't have been any problems. Of course, people would have said things, but they say things anyway. And if you have clean flour in your bag, let them talk. Let them pry and question and try to get things to stick. What do you care? Just go on with your business, and let your dad take care of the presidency, and all would have been fine.
But, no.

I'm sure you don't understand why the American people don't take kindly your dad refusing Camp David and instead spend time - and the government money - on his own property. 140 million dollars to play golf, straight into his own pockets...

”What didn’t change was the attacks from the left. If anything, they only got worse. Let them take their best shot, I thought, because there was something else that hadn’t changed.

The fight in us.” 


So poetic... But these last four years have just been a foreplay.

Friday, December 4, 2020

Junior is Triggered part IX

Well, Donny, I was taught to not let a-holes shut me up. I was also taught to take responsibility of allowing people to shut me up when I know they don't have the right to do so. People shutting up and then going around whining that they have been "silenced" are pathethic.

Ket’s Handy Checklist for Not Getting Called Racist, Misogynist, Fill-in-the-Blank Phobic

□  Don't say racist, misogynist, fill-in-the-blank-phobic things.

Seriously, who cares what people call you?

"Today, those on the left are allowed to say whatever they want with zero consequences. They’re allowed to question anyone, protest anyone, and start riots in opposition to anyone, and nothing will happen in return."

Except that the internet is filled with male rights activists and trumpettes who will try to make liberals cry by screaming at people who say anything they dislike. You get invited to Hannity, and praised for being so brave. :-D


 Nevertheless, words aren’t violence. They’re just words. Said someone very early on in this book. I suppose it applies just to your words. If someone says something "mean" about you, then it's all blizzard out there. Can't see your hand from all the snowflakes being upset and angry for having been offended. 

"Conservatives, on the other hand, are told to shut up and stay in the shadows. Countless times on college campuses I’ve had scared conservative students come up to me to say thank you for making them feel normal and welcome in their school. It is that bad and worse. Below is the first paragraph of an op-ed piece written last year by a student on the staff of the Yale Daily News .

Republicans are single-handedly destroying the Yale community...."

 Oh my goodness! Come on, junior! Read on, and even you must realize it's satire! Lily Rogers is Conservative. This is a more serious version of the above, also written by her: Yale's Culture of Disallowing Discourse

OK, Ben Shapiro...

"I met Ben Shapiro only once, but anyone who’s read a few lines of his work can tell straightaway that he is not a “fascist” or a member of the KKK. In fact, he’s among the few people in this country who have been willing to speak the truth about the Democrat Party’s association with racism, slavery, and the KKK. He’s also an Orthodox Jew, which would probably make it hard for him to be a Nazi, too. And, he’s not a Donald J. Trump supporter."

I'm sure he's willing to talk crap about the Democrat Party, but he's not "among the few people" who have been willing to do so. Seems to me most every USonian is willing to spout any crap they can get their hands on about their opponents. I'd have more respect if he was willing to speak the truth about the Republican Party's association with racism, but that he does not do.

Also "he's also an Orthodox Jew, which would probably make it hard for him to be a Nazi, too"... it would, if antisemitism is considered to be an essential part of being a Nazi. It doesn't make it hard for him to be a Fascist though. 

And, yeah, he is a Donald J. Trump supporter. He wasn't, but he changed his mind.

"Before Shapiro’s appearance, the University of California, Berkeley, smugly released this message: “Our commitment to free speech, as well as to the law, mandates that the students who invited Shapiro be able to host their event for those who wish to hear him speak.”

In other words, yeah, we’re committed to free speech, and we’re so gloriously tolerant of other opinions that we’ll let this event go on as planned."


No, it wasn't smug. It was a reminder of freedom of speech to the lefties who thought it was offensive to have Ben Shapiro spout his ideas against gays, women, liberals, and everything else he isn't, but the majority of Berkeley's students are, and against what Berkeley has stood for since its founding. It wasn't meant for deplorables like you, so you don't get it.

I'm pretty sure you haven't met any of the students who were scared because they very well knew the message of hate and intolerance Ben Shapiro has been spreading since he was a teenager. The offer of counseling services was to tell them that they have been heard and they didn't need to be afraid, even when the Conservative students seem to go out of their way to invite the most controversial speakers. Milo whateverhisnameis, and Ann Coulter? Why not invite KKK while you're at it.

Because most of the students aren't rioters. Most of the students just want to get along with their studies. There are over 40.000 students at Berkeley, and just "hundreds of protesters", and I would guess quite a lot of them didn't even go to Berkeley. You seem to be fully oblivious of the underbelly of internet and how quickly word gets around.

"anyone who wasn’t upset like a little baby about it" 

Yes, because you have never complained with one word when you are the object of hate campaigns.  :-D

"Berkeley spent $600,000 for security for Shapiro" - to say something everyone knew already, something he has said several times elsewhere, something he keeps saying.
"You couldn’t have a rally or hold an event unless it was sanctioned by the university, and the university wouldn’t sanction anything it thought was too inflammatory (read: interesting)."
Sounds like they should have kept the rule. It would have saved them $600.000 for security, and $500.000 for damage.
But they didn't, they did what they could to get the speech go on as planned, they tried to prevent the students from going berserk, and they were willing to pay to provide safety to the speaker, and here you are accusing them of stifling free speech. You really are disgusting.

On October 13th, a Democrat speaker was interrupted by Trump supporters


So, Erika Christakis and the Halloween controversy. 

I suppose none of you ever understood the point the minority students were trying to make. It wasn't because they expressed themselves poorly, it's because you simply refuse to acknowledge the fact that you don't understand another human being's reality being elementally different from yours.
One might think that adult can be left to make up their own mind of whether they want to engage in racism or not, but - come on. If that was true, there wouldn't be any racism in the world. 

I haven't seen the message Erika Christakis is responding to, but I doubt there was anything inappropriate in it. I have seen her message, and yes, it is insensitive. Cultural appropriation and ethnic slurs are not "a little bit obnoxious… a little bit inappropriate or provocative or, yes, offensive". It's not harmless. It's not "a thing that troubles you". To tell the minorities that they should just ignore this is... yeah. She deserved every bit of it.
The response from Yale students shouldn't have shocked anyone. They were correct.
And they were not an "angry mob attacking people". They were very upset, but all of them were doing their best to stay calm. Some managed better than others. There were people who were telling their friends off when they interrupted the professor. He was given a fair chance. The problem was that he didn't understand what they had done wrong.

Christian military commander who tried to cancel Halloween.


"A professor of math education at the University of Illinois wrote a paper declaring that math—that’s right, just good old math —was actually racist because it “operates as whiteness… and who is seen as part of the mathematical community is generally viewed as white.”"

Rochelle Gutierrez is brilliant. It doesn't surprise me at all that you don't get what she's actually saying.

But here's something to read for those who'd like to understand at least a little.
Rochelle Gutierrez: The Hero Mathematics Needs and Deserves

"Not long ago, 1,300 students at Oberlin College in Ohio signed a petition that would make a C the lowest grade that a student could receive in classes there. That was done, according to the letter, so that “no student would be made to feel less than ‘average.’” Sort of defeats the mathematical notion of “average.”" 

That's not why they did it. 

Denied: College refuses academic leniency for student protesters
Oberlin President Marvin Krislov denied the petition, but granted emergency incomplete requests for students who were impacted by the aftermath of the Mike Brown, Tamir Rice and Eric Garner cases.

"Another student demanded that before his class read Antigone , a classic Greek play that includes rape and violence, the professor should give “trigger warnings” so that no one would be “traumatized” by the violence in the play."

Just mock the rape victims, no-one's expecting anything else from you. Now, those who aren't insensitive assholes, might find this interesting:

In the Culture War Between Students and Professors, the University Is the Real Enemy

(Seriously, how many minutes would it take to warn the students of alarming content? TV does it all the time. Conservatives are banning books because of what's in them. "Is there homosexuality in this book, because if there is, I don't want to read it!" is a question often asked on GoodReads.)

"Everyone seems to have accepted the notion that college students need to be protected from ideas that make them uncomfortable. Instead of going to college to be challenged, they go to college to be coddled and sheltered from things they don’t like."

Straight men’s physiological stress response to seeing two men kissing is the same as seeing maggots
People Caught On Camera Calling Mum 'Disgusting' For Breastfeeding In Public
Just another day a woman was yelling at Salvation Army soldiers collecting donations because they were wearing masks.
A lot of adults get very upset, when they see someone obviously not Christian, or obviously a Democrat. So - your argument is very hollow.

Racism is not "a thing they don't like". 

Banning books because they talk about things someone doesn't want to hear about is "coddling", trigger warning is not.

"And this isn’t only an inference. The students have admitted it themselves. In a survey done in 2017, just after my father was elected and the fervor on campus was at its worst, 58 percent of college students said it was “important to be part of a campus community where I am not exposed to intolerant and offensive ideas.” When you narrow the respondents down to the ones who identify as “liberal,” the number goes up to 68 percent."

It's not inference at all. You are just picking random things and assuming they must mean one thing, because you don't understand what they really mean, and then you draw wrong conclusions of them.

A good example is that survey. 

Views among college students regarding the First Amendment: Results from a new survey
The Myth of the Campus Coddle Crisis: The Coddling of the American Mind

"In June of that year, a liberal professor named Lisa Feldman Barrett from Northeastern University published an op-ed in the New York Times titled “When Is Speech Violence?” Now, you might think, as I do, that the whole text of the article could have run about two words—“It isn’t”—but Professor Barrett went on for about eight hundred. “If words can cause stress, and if prolonged stress can cause physical harm, then it seems that speech—at least certain types of speech—can be a form of violence,” she wrote."

It's 912 words. If you read it, you didn't understand it. 

"But scientifically speaking, it’s not that simple. Words can have a powerful effect on your nervous system. Certain types of adversity, even those involving no physical contact, can make you sick, alter your brain — even kill neurons — and shorten your life."

If you don't believe this, if you seriously believe that words are just words, then why are you so upset about people calling you a racist, a traitor, and dozens of other things? Why are you so upset about what happens on the internet? It's all just words. If #theresistance doesn't mean anything, why do you even bother mentioning it? 

"If you’ve never heard of these things, allow me to define “microaggression” for you. Coined by a professor at Harvard University in the late 1970s, the term refers to harmless questions and statements that, although pure or benign in intention..."

Oh, no. They are not harmless and not pure or benign in intention. The people engaging in microaggressions might not be totally aware of the harm and malign of their words and actions, but the objects of their attacks are very aware of it. They are based on prejudice.
You even talk about them, against you.


"Maybe you’re stuck in an elevator with someone, and you think a quick icebreaker might make the ride go faster. Well, not so fast, say the liberals. Next time you’re in an elevator with someone of a different ethnic group, put your head down, shut up, and think about your white privilege."

Wouldn't it be nice, but I'm pretty sure you don't even know what white privilege is. Maybe just treat the other person like, you know, other person? Behave normally. I mean, it's totally fine to ask "where are you from", but when they respond "I'm from Logansport, Indiana", the correct response is something like "I have never been to Indiana, what's it like there?" and not "No... where are you really from. They don't have people who look like you in Indiana, you must be an immigrant."
It's really not difficult. 

"When you stop thinking that the intent of people matters, you take away all incentive to talk things out like adults."

No. Intent is only important when it comes to compensation and punishment. If you kill someone, the fact that you didn't intent to kill them doesn't much matter to the person you killed or their loved ones. It only matters in if you are condemned of murder or involuntary manslaughter. 

One could also point out that there are hundreds of thousands of words in the English language, and you won't die if you choose not to use a handful, in consideration of the other person. That is what talking things out like adults mean, not demanding your "right" to blurt out any crap that comes to mind. There are things like tact, kindness, and manners, even though you people try to erase them by calling them "being PC".

"It also accepts the premise that speech is violence, making it seem perfectly fine that any violence you do in return for that speech is justified. It’s no wonder that students have decided it’s okay to throw rocks, turn over cars, and beat “Nazis” with flagpoles."

Except that that survey you spoke of earlier also asked this question:
"A student group opposed to the speaker uses violence to prevent the speaker from speaking. Do you agree or disagree that the student group’s actions are acceptable?"

81% of responders disagreed. It is not acceptable to use violence to prevent the speaker from speaking. 80% of Democrats, 78% of Republicans, and 84% of Independents. 90% of women, 70% of men. 

"I mean, if speech really is violence and accusing someone of a crime counts the same as punching someone in the face, there are a whole bunch of reporters at CNN I’m sure my family and I would love to see brought up on charges."

You are confusing concepts here.
Speech can really be violence. Sometimes it's even a crime. Not in USA, though.
Accusing someone of a crime can also sometimes be a crime. Ever heard of defamation?
Punching someone in the face can also sometimes be a crime.
Then there's the intent, gravity, motivation... was it in self-defense?
It's not like you are innocent of this.

 cool black girl effect

"If I’ve learned one thing about children—and human beings in general—it’s that they can thrive only when they’re challenged. Just as your muscles won’t grow if you don’t put them under the stress of weight lifting and your mind won’t expand if you don’t fill it with difficult thoughts, books, and arguments, people can’t grow if they’re not made uncomfortable, or at least challenged, sometimes."

Not true. People who have grown up in very safe and loving and kind circumstances are stronger and healthier than people who have grown up in very unsafe, challenging and hard circumstances.

"Things in this third category actually become stronger the more pressure you apply to them. They can’t survive without stress and tension. This is the way human beings are, especially as children. The more stress we endure—to a point, of course—the stronger we become."

"To a point"... that's the point, isn't it. Most minority people have been exposed to more violence and stress already when they are at the college, most white people EVER will. You among them. The people talking about microaggressions have been on the receiving end of more racism than you ever will. They are asking for an environment where their race, ethnicity, religion, gender is not an issue, where they can focus on studying, learning, being challenged by the questions that arise from what they are learning, and not by stupid people.

"It’s our time to try out different ideas, talk things out with people our own age, and be exposed to all kinds of things we won’t see once we get out into the real world. For this to be effective, it has to include ideas that some people would consider “offensive.” Otherwise, there’s no opportunity for growth."

Are you seriously saying that minorities are not exposed to racism, microaggressions, macroaggressions, xenophobia and stupid people outside the college, and that's why this should be allowed to happen inside? How stupid can you be?

"If you’ve been paying attention to this chapter, you might get the impression that all college campuses are horrible all the time"

You have mentioned three... colleges? And a couple of instances that weren't much related, most were not even close the truth. And there's over 5000 of them in USA. Why would someone get an impression that that's all the college campuses? Is that what you tried to do? Is that what you built your idea of how horrible and antifa infested the campuses are today? What? Seriously?

 And then he tells a story about a party with over 1000 people and some college girls decided to take off all their clothes... and you talk about how handsome you are?
In five years that could be Kai.
Think about her climbing naked on a table in a college party to get to some dude old enough to be her dad...
I don't think you see that story as funny any more. I certainly hope you don't.